Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11830 (KAR)

H NAGARAJA v. SMT. THIPPAMMA

RSA/758/2021 · 2026-04-24

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22730 RSA No. 758 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.758 OF 2021 (DEC/PAR) BETWEEN: H. NAGARAJA S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/AT BEERENAHALLI VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 599. …APPELLANT (SRI H. NAGARAJA - APPELLANT (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. THIPPAMMA W/O LATE MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. RAMU S/O LATE MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 3. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 4. NAGARAJA S/O LATE MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS R/AT BEERENAHALLI VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 599. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22730 RSA No. 758 of 2021 5. SMT CHOWDAMMA W/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 6. GOVINDAPPA W/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 7. THIPPESHA W/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 8. GOVINDAPPA W/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESPONDENTS NOS.5 TO 8 ARE AGRICULTURISTS RESIDENTS OF BEERENAHALLY VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 599. 9. SMT. RAJAMMA W/O GANGADHARA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O HOSAKERE VILLAGE HAGALAVADI HOBLI @ POST, GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 10. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O VADERAHALLY VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522. 11. SMT. NINGAMMA W/O NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O V V PURA VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 598. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22730 RSA No. 758 of 2021 12. SMT SHIVALINGAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O BENAKANAHALLY VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 598. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHIDANANDA MURTHY M., ADVOCATE FOR C/R7) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.06.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.33/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIRIYUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.06.2019 PASSED IN OS No.142/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIRIYUR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant is called out. There is no representation. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55