HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29658 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned advocate, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Mutation Case No. 6135 of 2024 (Computer Case No. T202405440206135) (Suneeta Devi vs. Vishavnath @ Shivnath) be decided expeditiously. He further submits that Rule 34(7) of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016 provides to decide the mutation proceeding, if undisputed within a period of 45 days and if disputed within a period of 90 days. Rule 34(7) is reproduced below. "Rule - 34. Issue of Proclamation [Section 3591)].- ......................... (7) The Tahsildar shall make an endeavour to decide the undisputed case of mutation within the period of 45 days from the date of the registration of the case and the disputed case of mutation within the period of 90 days and if the proceeding is not concluded within such period the reason for the same shall be recorded. ........................" 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction be given to respondent no. 2 to decide the aforesaid mutation case. 4. On consent, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 [the Tehsildar (Judicial)] to decide the aforesaid mutation proceeding expeditiously, preferably within a period of 90 days from the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamalesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt Suneeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. September 30, 2026 sailesh WRIC No. 29658 of 2026 2 (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad