1 / 3 2026:CGHC:14749 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2873 of 2026 1 - Dr. Rajesh Pradhan S/o Shri Padman Pradhan Aged About 33 Years Resident Of Hosing Board Colony, Bilaigarh District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Dr. Vikas Nayak S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Nayak Aged About 34 Years Resident Of Housing Board Colony, Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Health Services Atal Nagar Raipur Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Mission Director National Health Mission Atal Nagar Raipur, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Community Health Center Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 2 / 3 30/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ order, thereby directing the respondent authorities to provide the fund under CRMC Scheme and to release the incentive amount to the petitioners for serving in difficult area i.e. Community Health Centre, Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authority to decide the representation of petitioner for releasing incentive amount stipulated period. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the policy formulated by the respondent No. 3, the medical officers who are working on deputation with respondent No. 3 are entitled for the amount of incentive under CRMC scheme. This scheme was brought in after 2016, petitioner was posted with respondent No. 3 in the year 2019, however, the petitioner was not paid the additional amount/ incentive under CMRC Scheme. Respondent No. 3 has already written letter to the respondent No. 4, however, letter written by respondent No. 4 has also not been considered. 3. Counsel for the respective respondents submits that the petitioner is seeking the relief under the CRMC, however, petitioner had not submitted representation before the concerned respondent authorities i.e. the respondent No. 3 and and 4 and if petitioner submits such representation, it will be considered and appropriate decision will be taken. 4. On due consideration of the submissions of counsel for the respective parties, the writ petition, at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation along with all supporting documents before respondent No. 3 and 4 and if such a representation is submitted, the concerned authorities shall consider 3 / 3 and take decision on the representation to be submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the representation. It is ordered accordingly. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE