Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11827 (KAR)

SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36059/2025 · 2026-04-10

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20140 WP No. 36059 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36059 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-50 YEARS, R/OF HUCHAMMANA DODDI VILLAGE, MUDDAPURA KERENAHALLI, RAMANAGARA TQ. BENGALURU SOUTH DIST - 562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARASHURAM HATTARAKIHAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 01, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, TALUKA ADMINISTRATIVE SOUDHA, B.M. ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH DIST - 562 159. 3. SHIVAKUMAR, S/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT-45 YEARS, R/OF HUCHAMMANA DODDI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20140 WP No. 36059 of 2025 MUDDAPURA KERENAHALLI, RAMANAGARA TQ. BENGALURU SOUTH DIST. - 562 159. 4. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR @ RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/OF HUCHAMMANA DODDI VILLAGE, MUDDAPURA KERENAHALLI, RAMANAGARA TQ. BENGALURU SOUTH DIST. - 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER NO.RRT DISP/0243/2025 DT. 28.10.2025 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-L TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that respondent No.1 has passed an order on 23.03.2026 rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20140 WP No. 36059 of 2025 transfer of katha. Therefore, learned counsel prays that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the order passed by respondent No.1. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6