Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11826 (BOM)

MADHURI SHAILESH POOJARY AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/4727/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 7-wp-4727-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4727 OF 2026 Madhuri Shailesh Poojary And Anr ...Petitioners Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents __________ Mr. Shantanu Ghosh (through VC) i/b Mr. Shubhankar Ghosh for Petitioners. Ms Supriya Kak- APP for State. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026. PC : 1. The Learned APP raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the present Petition, contending that the Petition, which seeks a writ of Habeas Corpus, is not maintainable. The Petitioner is arrested pursuant to the judicial order passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class (IIIrd Court) Kalyan dated 7th September 2026. 2. In response to the objection raised by the Learned APP, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner sees permission to withdraw Meera Jadhav MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date: 2026.09.29 11:16:17 +0530 2 of 2 7-wp-4727-26.doc this Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings challenging the said order. Permission is granted. 3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with such liberty. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Meera Jadhav