Chitra Sonawane. 35-WP-9631-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9631 OF 2026 Ekta Parksville Homes Pvt Ltd & Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. Vasai Virar City Municipal Corp. & Ors. ... Respondents. ... Mr. Birendra Saraf, Sr. Advocate a/w Bhushan Deshmukh, Mrs Jasmine Kachalia, Mr Sahil Singh, Ms Shweta Chopra, Roshan Mohod i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Petitioners. Mr Swapnil Patil for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms NS Bhide, GP a/w Mrs RM Shinde AGP for State. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The instant Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner with following substantive reliefs : " (a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that the plinth completion certificate for construction of the said Wings i.e., Wings A, B, C and D of Building No. 16 in Sector II of the said Land, is deemed to have been granted in terms of Section 45 of the MRTP Act read with Regulation 2.8.3 of the DCR 2001, in view of the fact that a duly 1 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date: 2026.09.29 12:05:52 +0530 Chitra Sonawane. 35-WP-9631-2026.doc completed application vide letter dated 31st March 2023 read with the letter dated 10th June 2024 (Exhibit 'N', and Exhibit 'O' hereto respectively), has been received by Respondent No. 2 but not been responded to or refused; (b) In the alternative to prayer clause (a), that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or any other appropriate order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to process and grant plinth completion certificate and further permissions for construction of the said Wings, i.e., Wings A, B, C and D of Building No. 16 in Sector II of the said Land, as applied by Petitioner No. Ivide the said Application, i.e., letter dated 31st March 2023 read with the letter dated 10th June 2024 (Exhibit 'N', and Exhibit 'O' hereto respectively), in accordance with law, within a period of 2 weeks or such other time, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper " 3. At the outset, Mr.Birendra Saraf, the learned Sr. Counsel submits that he is not pressing prayer clause (a). He submits that he confines the relief to prayer clause (b) wherein it is prayed that the Respondent/Authorities may be directed to decide the Petitioner's representation in form of Letters dated 31st March 2023 and 10th June 2024. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, we expect the concerned/ Competent Authority of the Respondent-Corporation to consider and decide the representation of the Petitioners contained in 2 Chitra Sonawane. 35-WP-9631-2026.doc Letters dated 31st March 2023 and 10th June 2024, preferably within 3 months from the date of uploading of this order. 5. We make it clear that we have not adverted to the merits of the matter. 6. The Petition is disposed of in above terms. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 3