Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1182 (UTT)

PANKAJ PRATAP MALIK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/7/2026 · 2026-02-13

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:941 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C-528 No.7 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Shashikant Shandilya, learned counsel for respondent no.2 4. The present C-528 application has been filed by the applicant seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 22.06.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st, Dehradun, and the order dated 09.12.2025 passed by the learned 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun in Criminal Case No. 3267 of 2015. By the said orders, a non-bailable warrant was issued against the applicant and notices were issued to the sureties. Subsequently, proceedings under Section 83 Cr.P.C. were also initiated against the applicant, along with the non-bailable warrant and notice to the sureties. 4. Since the controversy involved in the present C-528 application has already been decided in connected C- 528 No. 8 of 2026, subject to the condition that the applicant shall deposit ₹5 lakhs before the Court concerned on or before 27.02.2026, and the non-bailable warrant issued therein has been kept in abeyance, accordingly, the non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant in the present case shall also remain in 2026:UHC:941 abeyance, subject to the condition that the applicant deposits ₹5 lakhs in the connected case, i.e., C-528 No. 8 of 2026, within the stipulated period. 5. Accordingly, the present C-528 application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Alok Mahra, J.) 13.02.2026 Mamta