Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11819 (KAR)

SMT ANUSUYA DEVI v. KUM KUSUMA B

MFA/2730/2022 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU & SMT. H.R. RENUKA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.2730 OF 2022 (Lok Adalat No.836/2026) BETWEEN 1. SMT. ANUSUYA DEVI W/O. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SRI VENKATESH S/O. LATE CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.07, KODIPALYA VILLAGE RAMOHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU-560 060.w ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI PUTTA SWAMY C., ADVOCATE) AND 1. KUM. KUSUMA B. D/O. BETTAPPA NO.13, NEAR KUNDALAMMA TEMPLE Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 HUNASAMARADAPALYA VILLAGE RAMOHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU-560 060. (EXPARTE) (OWNER OF CAR NO.KA 41-MB-3705) 2. 3. MR. MAHESHA K. N. NO.65/2, 2ND MAIN ROAD 5TH CROSS ROAD, KAVERIPURA KAMAKASHIPALAYA BENGALURU-560 079. (EXPARTE) (POLICY HOLDER OF CAR NO.KA 41-MB-3705). SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., LEGAL OFFICE NO.3/1, RUKMINI TOWERS PLATFORM ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT 1988, PLEASED TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE AWARD PASSED BY THE XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER, MACT (SCCH-04) BENGALURU IN MVC NO.2308/2020, BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN ENHANCING THE AWARD OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants / Claimants are present. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 / Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After detailed negotiations, the matter has been settled between the parties. A joint memo signed by the learned Advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned Advocate appearing for respondent No.3/Insurance Company and an authorized officer has been filed. The appellants/claimants have agreed to receive and respondent No.3/Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,10,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Ten Thousand), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. Respondent No.3 / Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said 4 amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellants/claimants in equal proportion, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly and shall be communicated to the Tribunal for appropriate action at the earliest. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KS