Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006982026 2026:GAU-AP:739 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/48/2026 Tadar Piriya Son of Shri Tadar Gabla, present address G Sector, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented by the PP of AP 2:The Officer in Charge Age: 0 Occupation : Naharlagun Police Station Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Lipi Niri, T Taje,Priya Lomdak,A Bodo Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 06-08-2026 Heard Mr. A. Bodo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional PP for the State of AP. Page No.# 2/3 2. The applicant, Shri Tadar Piriya, has filed this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, read with Article 21 of the Constitution of India, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending her arrest in connection with Naharlagun P.S. Case No. 24/24, under Sections 343/326/317 of IPC read with Section 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986, 75 & 79 of JJB Act, 2015. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the incident occurred on 05.03.2024, and the case is still under investigation. 4. The case arose out of a FIR dated 12.04.2024, which was preferred after a complaint to the welfare committee child. The gist of the allegations brought is that the informant and two minor family members were working in the house of one Tadar Yamak and subsequently, one of his family member has assaulted causing injuries. 5. It is submitted that one co-accused of the case was granted pre-arrest bail by this Court on 06.11.2025 in AB/119/2025. The learned counsel has also drawn attention to the copy of the settlement deed dated 16.03.2024, purportedly made between the informant and the present petitioner, whereby, the parties are stated to have amicably settled the matter, undertaken to maintain cordial relationship and seeking withdrawal of the criminal case. 6. Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional PP submits that the scanned case diary has been received and fairly submits that as per instruction received from the IO, the custodial examination of the petitioner would not be necessary, but he may be directed to appear for recording his statement. It is Page No.# 3/3 submitted that Injury Report reveal simple injuries but the victims are minors, however. 7. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also considering the aspect of parity, it is directed that in the event, the petitioner is arrested in connection with the above case, he shall be allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject, of course, to the following conditions:- (i) He shall co-operate with the remaining investigation and appear before the I/O making himself available for examination; (ii) He shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence; (iii) He shall not intimidate harass or harm the informant/victim and their family members. 8. Violation of any of the bail conditions would entail cancellation of the bail. 9. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant