Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11813 (BOM)

J RAMACHANDRAN v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/2824/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 1-ia-3385-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2824 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3385 OF 2026 J Ramachandran ...Petitioner Versus Union Of India & Ors. ...Respondents __________ Mr. Ameet Naik a/w Ms Madhu Godadia a/w Mr. Vivek Dwivedi, Mr. Aryan Garg, Mr. Virendra Vikram i/b Naik Naik & co. for Petitioner/Applicant. Ms Supriya Kak APP for State. Mr. Kanhaiya Yadav h/f Mr. Neel Helekar for Respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Munde, Special PP a/w Jai Vohra for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ritesh Hegde a/w Mr. Amirth Purshothaman i/b Keeti K for Respondent No.4. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026. PC : 1 The prayer in the petition is for quashing and/or setting aside the Look Out Circular (LOC) issued against the Petitioner in in CBI BSFB Delhi Case No. RCBD12025E0005 at the instance of Respondent No.4-UCO Bank. Meera Jadhav MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date: 2026.09.29 11:16:17 +0530 2 of 2 1-ia-3385-26 2. Learned Special PP appearing for Respondent No.2 – CBI on instructions makes a statement that the LOC was issued at the instance of CBI and it is deleted. The statement is recorded and accepted. 3. In view of this statement, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not press the Petition. 4. Petition is disposed of. 5. In view of the disposal of the Petition, interim application does not survive and accordingly stands disposed of. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Meera Jadhav