HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16140 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard Sri Lal Behari Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4; learned Standing Counsel, representing State-respondents, and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 3 & 4 to sett-off their dues of loan from the Rs. 12,39,600/-already deducted from the salaries of the petitioner since December 2016 to December 2025 and excess amount of the petitioner may be paid and they may be directed to issue no dues certificate alongwith statement of account of the petitioner pertaining to aforesaid society. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to pay the unpaid retrial amounts of petitioners at an earliest date along with interest which is chargeable by nationalized Bank of India since 31.01.2026. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Nos .2 & 4 to decide the representation dated 17.06.2026 and 31.08.2026 respectively at an earliest date (Annexure Nos .4 & 5 with this writ petition). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lal Behari Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suyash Agarwal Bhaju Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) (iv) Issue any other suitable direction or order, as this Hon'ble Court, may deem just and proper under the circumstances of the present case." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 contends that he has no objection to issuance of a direction to respondents nos. 2 and 4 to decide the respective representations filed on behalf of the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. Having considered the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with a direction that respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 4 shall consider and decide the representations dated 17.06.2026 and 31.08.2026, respectively, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and self attested copy of the instant writ petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions and observations, instant writ petition stands disposed of. October 1, 2026 Neetu WRIA No. 16140 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad