Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11807 (PNJ)

KARANVIR SINGH v. MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS.

CR/2612/2026 · 2026-04-08

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

 123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2612-2026 Date of Decision: April 08, 2026 Karanvir Singh …Pe..oner Versus Mohinder Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) In a suit for declaraon with consequenal relief of permanent injuncon, filed by the peoner, an applicaon under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC was moved for interim relief. The Trial Court vide order dated 06.03.2026 directed issuance of noce to the opposite party, observing that there was no cogent ground for grant of ex parte ad interim injuncon. The ma.er was adjourned to 23.03.2026. This order dated 06.03.2026 was assailed by the peoner before the Appellate Court, which dismissed the appeal on the ground of maintainability vide order dated 10.03.2026 (Annexure P-1). 2. It is in the aforesaid back drop that present revision peon has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the peoner submits that as of now the case is fixed before the trial Court for 27.04.2026 for service of the respondents-defendants as their house was found to be locked as per report received on summons. Learned counsel further submits that the appellants are staking the claim in the suit property based upon the Will and that they are apprehensive that suit property may be sold further by the respondents. SARITA RANI 2026.04.08 16:48 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order  CR-2612-2026 - 2 - 2026:PHHC:053930 4. A6er hearing learned counsel for the peoner, present revision peon is hereby disposed of with a direcon to the trial Court concerned to decide the applicaon under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC on its merit a6er ensuring the service of the opposite party. It is further directed that ll the decision on the applicaon under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, further alienaon of the suit property shall remain stayed. Since this order has been passed without issuing noce to respondents, in order to avoid the delay, therefore, they will be at liberty to approach this Court, in case, they feel aggrieved by this order. April 08, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.04.08 16:48 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order