NIMAY KAIBART ALIAS NIMAY KAIVART v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1706/2026 · 2026-05-15
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11807 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11807 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1706 of 2026 ---- Nimay Kaibart @ Nimay Kaivart , aged about 24 years, son of Late Mansa Kaibart, Resident of village Narayanpur Bangali Tola, Post office Seraikella, Police Station Seraikella, District Seraikella Kharsawan.
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. ----
03/Dated: 15th May, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant who is in custody since 12.04.2025 has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.131 of 2025 arising out of Gamharia P.S. Case No.35 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) and 238(a) of the BNS, pending in the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-II at Seraikella.
3. Earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide
order dated 25.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.8386 of 2025.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that two witnesses have already been examined and they have declared hostile. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
6.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the material available on record, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, the present bail application stands rejected once again.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 15th May, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded