RAHUL PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
NABAIL/9911/2026 · 2026-09-29
Vivek Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11806 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11806 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9911 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant pointed out that the applicant has been arrested, therefore, the present anticipatry bail application may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made above, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 30, 2026 Nitendra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Karuna Karan Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Rahul Pratap Singh Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad