Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11805 (JHR)

ARSH SAURABH v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE) THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

WPC/3308/2026 · 2026-05-05

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13285 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3308 of 2026 …….. Arsh Saurabh, S/o Amit Kumar Sahu, R/o Ormanjhi, P.O.-Ormanjhi, P.S.- Ormanjhi, Dist.-Ranchi, State-Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) through its Chairman Shiksha Kendra, 2 Community Centre, Preet Vihar, P.O. & P.S.-Preet Vihar, New Delhi 2. Regional Officer, CBSE, Regional Office, Patna, Ambika Complex, Behind State Bank Colony, Sheikhpura Bailey Road, Patna 3. Delhi Public School, Greater Ranchi through its Principal Village, Village-CCP8+4M4, Neori Vikas, Mesra, P.O.-Neori, P.S.-Mesra, Dist.- Ranchi, Alternative Address, Delhi Public School, Bhagalpur, 7322+QP3, Deekshapuram Sabour, N.H. 80 Deekshapuram, Bhagalpur, Bihar … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent-CBSE : Mr. Sonal Tiwari, Advocate …...... 03/ 05.05.2026 Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that name of mother of the petitioner has been wrongly recorded in the Marksheet/Certificate (2022) and all the Certificates issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education for Class-X. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of mother of the petitioner is “Sunaina Sahu”, but in the marksheet and certificate of Class-10 of C.B.S.E examination it has been typed as “Sunita Sahu”, though the correct name as “Sunaina Sahu” has been recorded in Class-12 marksheet and certificate by the examining authority i.e. C.B.S.E. He also submits that even in the transfer certificate of Class-10 the correct name of mother of the petitioner has been printed as “Sunaina Sahu”, which is correct. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that vide Annexure-4 the Principal of the school has forwarded a request to the Regional Office of C.B.S.E, Patna, but C.B.S.E has not taken any action. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of C.B.S.E. submits that the C.B.S.E. will consider the application of the petitioner and will do the needful at the earliest. 6. Consider the said submission, I direct the petitioner to approach the In-charge of the Regional Office of C.B.S.E, Patna along with all the documents along with the copy of the letter of Principal of Delhi Public School Greater Ranchi. On receipt of the same, within four weeks from today, the Central Board of Secondary Education, Patna will take appropriate steps and make necessary correction and issue fresh corrected Marksheet/Certificate and other Certificates to the petitioner. 7. The entire process should be completed within a period of 10 (ten) weeks from the date of receipts of a copy of this order along with the fresh representation filed by the petitioner. 8. With this observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. 9. Pending, I.A., if any, stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 05th May, 2026 R.S./S.K.C. Uploaded on 12 /05/2026.