Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11805 (BOM)

ATUL AMRITLAL RANA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APL/1548/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P1. CRI APL-1548-26.odt Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1548 OF 2026 Atul Amritlal Rana & Anr. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Tamsin Monis, Advocate for Applicants ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 P. C. : 1. Not on board. 2. A praecipe is moved on behalf of Applicants for speaking to the minutes of order dated 22.09.2026. 3. It is stated in the praecipe that though present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), inadvertently there is no mention of prayer clause (b) in paragraph No. 4 of the said order. In view thereof, prayer clause (b) be added in the said paragraph which reads thus:- "b) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to accept the C-Summary Final Report filed by Goregaon Police Station in FIR No. 495 of 2022 qua the Applicants and discharge / release the Applicants from the proceedings in C.C. No. 2107/MISC/2025 or any proceedings arising out of it." 4. Addition to the above effect be carried out in the said order and fresh order be uploaded. Rest of the said order shall remain as it is. 1 of 2 P1. CRI APL-1548-26.odt 5. Praecipe is disposed. Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2026.09.29 20:08:48 +0530