Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11802 (CHH)

VIPUL SAGAR JAGGI v. SMT. AKANSHA JAGGI

FA(MAT)/186/2023 · 2026-05-05

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21121-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No.186 of 2023 Vipul Sagar Jaggi S/o Shri Ravindra Kumar Jaggi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Mata Mandir, Village Karkapaal, P.S. Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus Smt. Akansha Jaggi W/o Shri Vipul Sagar Jaggi, Aged About 26 Years C/o R/o Father Shri Ravindra Jaari, Dewanganpara, Gedam, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Appellant : Shri Ashutosh Trivedi, Advocate appears along with the Appellant-Vipul Sagar Jaggi Respondent : Smt. Akansha Jaggi appeared in person D.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Judgment on Board Per Sanjay S. Agrawal, J. 06/05/2026 1) Heard on I.A.No.1/2026, an application filed jointly by the parties under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of marriage by way of mutual consent. 2) From perusal of the record, it appears that the marriage between the appellant-Vipul Sagar Jaggi and the respondent-Akansha Jaggi was solemnized on 29/04/2018 at Jagdalpur in accordance with the SATISH TUMANE Digitally signed by SATISH TUMANE Date: 2026.05.06 15:24:23 +0530 2 Hindu Rites and Rituals, but due to serious differences arose between them, they started living separately since 14/11/2018. It appears further that a proceeding enumerated under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was initiated by the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage registered as Civil Suit No.100-A/2019 and by virtue of the impugned judgment and decree dated 24/04/2023 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG), the same has been dismissed and being aggrieved, the instant appeal has been preferred. 3) During the pendency of this appeal, the matter was directed to be referred to the Mediation Center vide order dated 05/01/2026 and in pursuance thereof, the parties appeared before the concerned Mediation Center, where on 12/02/2026, the parties have arrived at a compromise and, a formal Mediation Report, being Mediation R.No.18/2026/Deed of Settlement was executed between them on the said day i.e. on 12/02/2026 and based upon the terms and conditions stipulated therein, the parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage, solemnized on 29/04/2018, by way of mutual consent. The parties present over here, have stated specifically that the said compromise was arrived at between them without any pressure or any kind of undue influence and, it, thus, appears that the said compromise was arrived at between them lawfully. 4) Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, considering further the terms and conditions stipulated in the said Mediation Report, being Mediation R.No.18/2026/Deed of 3 Settlement dated 12/02/2026, we are inclined to allow the said application. 5) Accordingly, the application (I.A. No.1/2026) moved jointly by the parties under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on 20/04/2026 is allowed and, the marriage solemnized between the parties on 29/04/2018 is hereby dissolved, based upon their mutual consent and, the terms and conditions mentioned in the said Mediation Report, being Mediation R.No.18/2026/Deed of Settlement shall forming the part of the decree. 6) In view of above, the First Appeal (Mat.) No.186/2023 stands disposed of. 7) A decree be drawn accordingly. SD/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge SD/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Tumane