SRI SAPATAKOTI HARIJANA MAHILA MANDALI R v. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
WP/11488/2026 · 2026-04-24
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22485 WP No. 11488 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11488 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SAPATAKOTI HARIJANA MAHILA MANDALI (R) SRI SIMHADRI NILAYA, BEHIND OKKALIGARA HOSTEL, 2ND CROSS, C.K PURA, CHITRADURGA-577501 (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT 1960) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT. B.M. RASHMI.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION BMC AND RI CAMPUS K.R. ROAD BENGALURU-560002.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE SPECIAL OFFICER KARNATAKA NURSING AND PARA MEDICAL EDUCATION(REGULATION) AUTHORITY PARA MEDICAL BOARD
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22485 WP No. 11488 of 2026
NO.40/20A, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, FIRST FLOOR, OPP. VANI VILAS HOSPITAL BENGALURU-560002.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA B., AGA FOR R1;
SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO.PMB/197/REG/365/2020-21 27.02.20266 VIDE ANNEXURE J.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the parties, respondent No.2 has issued the letter dated Annexure- J directing the petitioner to submit the renewal copy of the petitioner - Society for year 2024-25.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22485 WP No. 11488 of 2026
3. In that view of the matter, there is no impediment for the petitioner to provide the document as sought for by respondent No.2. Accordingly, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Petition.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21