Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11800 (ALL)

SOHIB KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/39710/2026 · 2026-09-29

Indrajeet Shukla, J J Munir

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39710 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. Heard Sri Akash Jaiswal holding brief of Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.B.Sinha, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. No one appears for the bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his bank account that was frozen earlier on account of there being a hold for a certain amount has been restored to operation except for the disputed amount which the police have intimated the bank to withhold. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. It is consigned to record. September 30, 2026 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jainendra Kumar Mishra (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.) Sohib Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad