Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 118 (UTT)

PRANITA RANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/386/2026 · 2026-02-13

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:887 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS 386/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Narayan Datt, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:- “I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding/directing the respondents two pay the Education extension period benefit salary from 1.06.2024 to 31.03.2025 to the respondents excluding the pension received by the petitioner between this period.” (3) This Court is not inclined to go into the issues raised by the petitioner. Writ petition, however, is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the competent authority. If petitioner makes representation to the competent authority within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.2.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198 d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FC A58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.02.13 17:42:38 +05'30' 2026:UHC:887