VIVEK SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/318/2026 · 2026-02-18
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 318/2026 CM Nos. 764/2026 & 853/2026
Vivek Sharma …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. C. Sharma, Advocate.
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (18.02.2026)
01. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition in case respondents do not allow him to join the service. His statement is taken on record.
02. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed along with connected application(s) with leave and liberty as prayed for.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
18.02.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 106 Supplementary List-II Bunty Kumar 2026.02.08 20:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document