Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040013222026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/182/2026 Nabam Komal Son of Late Nabam Tagung, permanent resident of Rupung Village, Sangdupota Circe, PO and PS Balijan, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Upper Niti Vihar, PO Itanagar, PS Niti Vihar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Secretary, General Administration, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Executive Engineer (UD) Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Urban Affairs Itanagar Division Itanagar. 4:The Assistant Commissioner cum Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Tukrin Ligu, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/346/2026 Nabam Komal Age: 41 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Nabam Tagung permanent resident of Rupung Village Sangdupota Circe PO and PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Upper Niti Vihar PO Itanagar PS Niti Vihar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary General Administration Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Itanagar Capital Complex Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Executive Engineer (UD) Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Department of Urban Affairs Itanagar Division Itanagar. 4:The Assistant Commissioner cum Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Itanagar Capital Complex Itanagar. ------------ Advocate for : Adam Tatak Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 3 Ors: Advocate ,
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 13.08.2026
Heard Mr. Tukrin Ligu, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Pura Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the Opposite Parties. 2. By way of the present interlocutory application, the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the connected writ petition, being WP(c)346(AP)2026, pending adjudication before this Court, with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy of preferring an appeal under Section 12 of the Arunachal Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants Act), 2003, which is stated to be pending consideration before the Deputy Commissioner, Itanagar Capital Complex. 3. Prayer made by Mr. Ligu, learned counsel for the applicant, has not been opposed by Ms. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate.
4. In view of the above, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. 5. Consequently, the connected writ petition being WP(c)346(AP)2026, stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy available under the provisions of Arunachal Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants Act), 2003. JUDGE Comparing Assistant