23-WP-1294-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1294 OF 2026 Ramesh Dhanraj Murpana …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w. Mr. Omneel A. Jadhav, for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Tapish Jain, for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 29th SEPTEMBER 2026 PC:- 1. At the outset, Mr. Jain, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 states that there is an alternate remedy available to challenge the impugned order dated 4th November 2023 of issuing process. 2. In view of the above contention raised by Mr. Jain, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2, Mr. Mundargi, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to adopt an appropriate proceedings. Page 1 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.09.29 14:53:44 +0530 23-WP-1294-2026.DOC 3. Accordingly, leave as aforesaid is granted. 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 5. It is clarified that as the impugned order is dated 4th November 2023 and the Writ Petition has been filed on 14th February 2024 and is being disposed of today, the Petitioner will get benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from 14th February 2024 till today i.e. 29th September 2026. 6. It is further clarified that all the contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali