1 ( 2026:HHC:22438 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.581 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Kamla Devi ....Petitioner Versus Aproov Devgan …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Reply/compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein it has been stated that the competent authority, i.e. Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Sunderngar has passed the order dated 21.04.2026, after conducting detailed inquiry from Tehsildar, Sundernagar and decided the representation of the petitioner on merits and, thus, has complied with the directions/order passed by this Court. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:22438 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid order dated 21.04.2026, in accordance with law, if she is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 16, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)