[2026:JHHC:14143] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3946 of 2026 ------ Mandeep Kumar Yadav @ Mandeep Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Mahesh Yadav, resident of village- Panchi, P.O. + P.S.- Satbarwa, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 134, 140 of the B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person Ramesh Kumar Yadav abducted and committed murder of son of the informant namely Pankaj Kumar Yadav. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Ramesh Kumar Yadav, who committed the murder because of the land dispute going on between his father and the father of the deceased. It is then submitted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 17 of the instant bail application and he has been in custody since 30.10.2025 as mentioned in para-07 of the instant bail application and charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Palamau in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/05/2026 Amar/