Page No.# 1/6 GAHC040012692026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/164/2026 Dorjee Khirmey and 14 Ors Son of Late S K Khirmey, resident of Village Rupa, PO and PS Rupa, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Tsering Dondup Age: Occupation : Son of late Kejang Dondup resident of Village Morshing PO and PS Kalaktang West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Sangey Norbu Age: Occupation : Son of Nawang Tashi resident of Village Dungse PO and PS Jung Tawang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Upendra Prasad Age: Occupation : Son of Late D Prasad DIC Office Pasighat PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Tenzin Jamba Kee Age: Occupation : Page No.# 2/6 Son of Late Tashi Tsering resident of Village Bomdir Basti PO Kitpi PS and District Tawang Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Nyumgum Kamgo Age: Occupation : resident of Village Dego Kamki PO and P Kamba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 7: Tana Dulom Age: Occupation : resident of Village Dulom PO and PS Daporijo Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 8: Tagam Tatak Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tanyong Tatak resident of Village Riga PO and PS Boleng Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 9: Sonam Tsering Sherchokpa Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tsering Gombu Sherchokpa resident of Village Thembang PO and PS Dirang West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 10: Taj Rajner Age: Occupation : Son of Late Taj Richo resident of Village Yachuli PO and PS Yachuli Keyi Panyor District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 3/6 11: Tarok Lomtung Age: Occupation : Son of Late Tapang Lomtum resident of Village Pangkeng PO Rumgong PS Pessing Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 12: Smti Yangjom Age: Occupation : Daughter of Late Sangja resident of Dirang PO and PS Dirang West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 13: Chow Bilaseng Namchoom Age: Occupation : Son of Late Chow Digen Namchoom Office of the DIPR (Soochna Bhawan) Papu Nallah PO Naharlagun PS Papu Nallah Arunachal Pradesh. 14: Wangchin Gombu Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kesang Gombu resident of Village Kharung Bongkhar Circle PO Mogto PS Jang Tawang District Arunachal Pradesh. 15: Chukhu Paji Age: Occupation : resident of Village Doimukh -II PO and PS Doimukh Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 4/6 VERSUS Namgey Lanka and 5 Ors Son of Late Namgey Wangchu, resident of Village Khet, PO Mukto, PS Jang, Tawang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The State of AP Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Personnel Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Commissioner and Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 5:The APPSC Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar 6:The Screening Committee Age: 0 Occupation : constituted by the Department of of Personnel for scrutiny of documents of the eligible candidates Advocate for the Petitioner : Chatung Tajo, Advocate for the Respondent : Rinchin Ledo Thungon, Nani Anju,S/C APPSC,SC (Education),Taba Tagum,GA (AP) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Page No.# 5/6 Date : 07-08-2026 Heard Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Pangsu, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh and Mr. T Tagum, learned standing counsel, Education Department. The present interlocutory application has been instituted by the applicant praying for a correction with regard to a typographical error occasioning in the order dated 07-01-2026 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) No. 319/2025. It is projected that vide the said interlocutory application, the applicant, therein, had sought for impleading themselves as respondents in the W.P.(C) No. 552/2025. It is submitted that there were in total 15 applicants who had sought to such impleadment. The said impleadment was allowed by this Court vide order dated 07-01-2026 passed in the said I.A.(C) No. 319/2025. However, while impleading the respondents, it was directed that the respondents are to be impleaded as respondent Nos. 7 to 15. It is projected that on account of the said typographical error occasioning in the said order, all the 15 applicants could not be deemed to have been impleaded in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the present interlocutory application has been filed to correct the typographical error, inadvertently entering in the said order dated 20-01-2026. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. This Court, on consideration of the matter finds that the typographical error admittedly had occasioned in the order dated 07-01-2026 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) No. Page No.# 6/6 319/2025, wherein it has been projected that the applicants, therein, had been permitted to be impleaded themselves as respondent Nos. 7 to 18 in W.P.(C) No. 552/2025. In view of the above, the paragraphs in the order dated 07-01-2026, wherein the said typographical error has occasioned is extracted hereinbelow: “After considering the submissions at the Bar, the prayer is allowed. The applicants are hereby allowed to be impleaded as respondent No. 7 to 18 in W.P.(C) No. 552(AP)/2025” The said paragraph would now be read in the said order dated 07-01-2026 as follows: “After considering the submissions at the Bar, the prayer is allowed. The applicants are hereby allowed to be impleaded as respondent No. 7 to 21 in W.P.(C) No. 552(AP)/2025” With the above observations and directions, the present interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant