1 ( 2026:HHC:22434 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.294 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate has placed on record communication dated 11.06.2026, alongwith copy of order dated 06.06.2026, wherein it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-Department, vide order dated 06.06.2026. 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:22434 ) petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the consideration order in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 16, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)