Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11780 (BOM)

SHOBHA ATMARAM PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/10923/2026 · 2026-09-23

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

939 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 814 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 814 OF 2025 IN WP/2442/2024 Shobha Atmaram Patil Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Ganesh Gadhe h/f. Adv. Jitendra Vijay Patil for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State • Adv. Deepali Nikalje h/f. Adv. A. G. Talhar for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 __________________________________________________________ WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10923 OF 2026 IN CP/814/2025 ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) For the reasons stated in the Civil Application No. 10923 of 2026, it stands allowed in terms of prayer clause "A". 3) Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:43927-DB 939 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 814 OF 2025 4) After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to added Respondent Nos. 8 and 9, returnable within two weeks thereafter. 5) Stand over to 21.10.2026. 6) Hamdast allowed. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2