VINOD HARKISHANDAS SANGHAVI v. MR. NAGINDAS ARYA AND ANR
IA/12751/2024 · 2026-09-24
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11779 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11779 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
907 IA 12751 OF 2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12751 OF 2024 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (L.) NO. 16622 OF 2024
Vinod Harkishandas Sanghavi … Applicant Versus Nagindas Arya and Anr. …. Respondents Mr. Anish Karande i/b. M/s. Dastur Kambli & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. Y. Shankar a/w. Ms. Priyta Mailurkar a/w. Nazreen Khan, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM:
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED:
24th SEPTEMBER, 2026. PC:-
1. The parties have settled their disputes, and the Consent Terms are filed before this Court. The parties were present in Court on 22nd September, 2026, when this Court directed the parties to remain present before the Registrar (Judicial–I) to verify the Consent Terms and the parties to the Consent Terms. The Registrar (Judicial–I) was directed to file a Report before this Court. Accordingly, Report is filed by the Registrar (Judicial–I).
Rajeshri Aher RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date: 2026.09.29 13:30:18 +0530
907 IA 12751 OF 2024.DOC
2. A Report has been submitted to this Court by the Registrar (Judicial–I), stating that he has verified the Consent Terms and the parties to the Consent Terms, and has ascertained from them that the Consent Terms were executed by their free will and that they have understood the Consent Terms, as explained to them by their respective Advocates.
3. Considering the Report submitted by the Registrar (Judicial– I), the Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms shall form part of the order of this Court as an Annexure. Paragraph 6 of the Consent Terms provides for an agreement between the parties to set aside the judgments passed by both the Courts below. In view of the same, the judgments passed by both the Courts below, namely, the judgment dated 24th April, 2015, passed by the Small Causes Court at Bombay in R.A.E. Suit No. 1167 of 2004, and the judgment dated 6th March, 2024, passed by the Appellate Court of the Small Causes Court at Bombay in Appeal No. 268 of 2015, are set aside.
4. All pending Interim Applications stand disposed of.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
Rajeshri Aher