Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11777 (ALL)

YASHWANT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/16127/2026 · 2026-09-30

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16127 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 to pay the full and final pension amount of Rs. 1,12,720/- month to month regularly. b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 to release the withheld 10% pension amount to the petitioner alongwith the admissible rate of interest from the date of retirement i.e. 28.02.2023 till the date of releasing the payment forthwith. c) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 to release the remaining gratuity amount of Rs. 12,11,988/- to the petitioner alongwith admissible rate of interest." 3. Sri Ashok Kumar Lal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents No. 1 and 2, submits that the grievance of the present petitioner raised in the instant writ petition can be more appropriately redressed by the Principal Secretary (respondent No. 1), and that he has no objection, if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner redressing his grievance, within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yashwant Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Principal Secretary (respondent No. 1) ventilating his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of two weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he, either himself or through the authority concerned, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. October 1, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 16127 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad