Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11766 (CHH)

D.D. TONDER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9018/2019 · 2026-02-09

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7345 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9018 of 2019 1. D.D. Tonder S/o Shri R.D. Tonder Aged About 44 Years Working As Deputy Jailer, Jail Parisar, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Director General Of Police (Prison), Jail And Correctional Services, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Its Chairman, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rudra Pratap Dubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 10.02.2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Section 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioner on the post of Deputy Superintendent of Prison (Jailor) w.e.f 31.03.2017. MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.02.11 10:27:59 +0530 2 2. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel also that the petitioner has already been promoted on 24.09.2025 on the post of Deputy Superintendent of Jail in the pay scale of Rs. 38100-120400 w.e.f. 02.04.2022. 3. Since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing is required to be adjudicated at this juncture. However liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 24.09.2025 to the extent of grant of monetary benefits. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of granting aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. 5. Copy of the order dated 24.09.2025 is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish