Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11765 (BOM)

ISMAIL RASOOL TELI AND ANOTHER v. LAXMAN MANILAL MOCHI AND OTHERS

WP/1553/2023 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 903-wp-1553-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1553 OF 2023 Ismail Rasool Teli And Another VERSUS Laxman Manilal Mochi And Others ... None for the petitioners. Mr. V. P. Raje h/f Mr. G. S. Rane, Advocate for Respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 ….. CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- . This matter was called out in the first session. Nobody appeared for the petitioners. 2. Mr. G. S. Rane, learned Advocate for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 was present. He placed on record an order dated 24.10.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Chopda, District Jalgaon in Regular Darkhast No.04 of 2021. Mr. Rane submits that the execution proceedings out of which the present Writ Petition has arisen itself is now no more. He submits that on account of a pursis produced below Exhibit-197 filed by the decree holder, the Darkhast has been withdrawn by the decree holders. 2026:BHC-AUG:43154 2 903-wp-1553-2023 3. To give an opportunity to the petitioners to comment on this submission, the matter was kept in the second session. 4. Mr. V. P. Raje h/f Mr. G. S. Rane, learned Advocate respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 submits that Mr. Rane has informed Mr. B. R. Warma about today’s matter and that the matter is kept in the second session. 5. In the second session also, none present for the petitioners. Copy of the order dated 24.10.2024 passed below Exhibit-1 in Regular Darkhast No.04 of 2021 is taken on record and marked as ‘Annexure-X’ for the purpose of identification. Considering that the Darkhast proceeding itself is withdrawn by the decree holder, nothing survives in this Writ Petition. Hence, Writ Petition stands disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2026