Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11760 (PAT)

Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep Chaurasiya v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./18848/2026 · 2026-03-31

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18848 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep Chaurasiya S/O Chhotan Chaurasiya R/O Village- Sangat Tola, Katri Sarai, P.S- Katri Sarai, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 316(2), 318(2), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of BNS and Sections 66(c) and 66(D) of I.T. Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that police has got secret information that the petitioner along with others was involved in cyber fraud and on this input, police reached the place of of occurrence and the petitioner along with others was apprehended. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18848 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 2/3 FIR, it is clear that only one mobile has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner and on that mobile, on the Whatsapp, Kerala Lotery was found on D.P. and advertisment of PM Mudra Loan was there. Learned counsel has submitted that there is no allegation that petitioner has committed cyber fraud with anyone. From perusal of the order of the learned trail court, it is clear that learned trial court has recorded that from perusal of para-11 of case diary, it will transpire that this petitioner has given his confessional statement and has accepted his guilt. Learned counsel has further submitted that save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against him. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.12.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has stated that altogether two mobiles have been recovered but as far as complain regarding commission of cyber fraud with anyone is concern, on this question, learned APP was also silent. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 570 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18848 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 3/3 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T