[2026:RJ-JP:14409] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.4705/2026 Parveen Kumar Mainawat S/o Shri Ramkaran, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Plot No.1, Taranagar, Mangyawas, Mansarover, Jaipur. (Accused In Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Guria, Adv. and Ms. Vandana Dabi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.357/2024, registered at Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur City (North), District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since more than a year. It is also contended that several complaints were filed against the petitioner and the Co-ordinate Bench in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9719/2025 granted bail after considering the petitioner's long incarceration. It is argued that accused-petitioner is in custody [2026:RJ-JP:14409] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4705/2026] since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and it is alleged against the petitioner that on the basis of a forged patta, the petitioner has obtained huge amount from the complainant and several FIRs were also lodged against the petitioner alleging similar nature of offence, therefore, considering the aforesaid fact, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Parveen Kumar Mainawat S/o Shri Ramkaran, in connection with FIR No.357/2024, registered at Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur City (North), District Jaipur City (North), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:14409] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4705/2026] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-32