APHC010456452015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3625] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT NO: 578/2015 Between: 1. CHIRUMAMILLA PUNNAMA, W/O. SUBBA RAO R/O. D.NO. 2/200, DOCTOR'S PLOTS, OPP: KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. CHIRUMAMILLA AKASH, S/O. MAHESH REP. BY MOTHER GUARDIAN CHIRUMAMILLA CHAITANYA R/O. D.NO. 76-10/3-23, NULAKAPET, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520 012, KRISHNA DISTRICT. DISCHARGING THE RESPONDENT NO 1 MOTHER AS GUARDIAN AND PERMITTING THE RESPONDENT TO DEFEND THE CASE VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 28-07-2025 IN I.A.NO. 1/2021 IN A.S.NO. 578/2025 2. GADE PRABHAVATHI, W/O. GADE RAMESH R/O. D.NO. 6-33/1, SRI DURGA VILAS, SITARAMPURAM, JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dt. 10-3-2015 in OS No. 53 of 2013 (Old OS No. 277/2010) on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 1667 OF 2015 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the 1st Respondent, his agents, representatives and henchmen from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of schedule property in OS NO. 53 of 2013 (Old OS No. 277 of 2010) on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama, Krishna District pending disposal of the above appeal in this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(ASMP 1416 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed in ASMP No.1667/2015 in AS No.578/2015 dated 13.08.2015 in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2016(ASMP 1607 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the appellant in the above appeal to deposit Rs.50,000/- per month out of the rentals of suit schedule property, otherwise the petitioner herein shall be suffer irreparable loss and damage IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Discharge the petitioner's mother as Guardian by permitting the Petitioner/ Respondent No.1 to defend his , case A.S. No. 578 of 2015 on the file of this Hon'ble Court in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Fix an Early Date for hearing of the above Appeal Suit i.e., A.S.No.578 of 2015 on the file of this Hon'ble Court IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to expedite the hearing of the above Appeal Suits A.S.No.578 of 3 2015 on the file of this Hon’ble Court, pending disposal of the Appeal Suit and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A.NAVEEN KUMAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 667/2015 Between: 1. CHIRUMAMILLA PUNNAMA, W/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2/200, DOCTOR'S PLOTS, OPP: KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. CHIRUMAMILLA AKASH, S/o.Mahesh, aged about 11 years, Rep.by mother guardian Chirumamilla Chaitanya Aged about 35 years, R/o.D.No. 76- 10/3-23, Nulakapet, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada-520 012, Krishna District. Discharge the Respondent mother as guardian and permitting the respondent to defend the case vide court order dated28.07.2025 in I.A..No. 2/21 in A.S.No.667/2015 ...RESPONDENT aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dt.10-03-2015 in 0 S No. 4 of 2013 (Old O.S.No.288/2010) on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 1732 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay ofi* days in presenting the above appeal aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dt.10- 03-2015 in 0 S No.4 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama and pass 4 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent herein to deposit the rents of plaint Schedule property of an extent of Ac.0-03 cents 737 sq. links equivalent to 180.88 sq.yards of house site along with structures of ground, first, rd floor and a sheet shed therein situated in 'Sy.No.302/6 and Survey No.310/4 Asst.No.106900524. D.No.6-33/1, Seetharampuram, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District before this Hon'ble Court in the interest of Justice IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Discharge the petitioner's mother as Guardian by permitting the Petitioner) Respondent herein to defend his case A.S. No.667 of 2015 on the file of this Hon'ble Court in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. DEEPIKA GADDE 2. A.NAVEEN KUMAR The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT Nos.: 578 and 667 OF 2015 COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma) 1. These appeals are arising out of the common judgment and decrees dated 10.03.2015 passed in O.S.Nos.4 and 53 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama. 2. The appellant in both the appeals is common. Respondent No.1 is her grandson and respondent No.2 is her daughter-in-law and the mother of respondent No.1. 3. The appellant in A.S.No.578 of 2015 is the grandmother of the respondent No.1 / Chirumamilla Akash. 4. Sole respondent in A.S.No.667 of 2015 and respondent No.1 in A.S.No.578 of 2015 is one and the same. The grandson was initially represented by his mother as next friend / guardian and subsequently, he has been declared as a major. 5. The suit in O.S.No.53 of 2013 (Old Suit No.277 of 2010) was filed by the grandson against his grandmother for declaration of title on the strength of the gift deed executed by the grandmother in his favor. The suit was allowed / decreed, declaring him as the absolute owner and stating that the gift deed is not liable for cancellation. 6 6. The suit in O.S.No.4 of 2013 (Old O.S.No.288 of 2010) was filed by the grandmother for cancellation of the gift deed executed by her in favour of the grandson and the same was dismissed. 7. Aggrieved by the decree granted in favour of the grandson and the dismissal of her suit, the grandmother has filed both the appeals. 8. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents, who appeared virtually. 9. Now, the appellant and the respondent, pursuant to the settlement arrived between the parties, have filed the joint memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeals and for confirmation of the judgment and decree, however, subject to the terms contained in the settlement between the parties. Both parties also physically appeared and confirmed the terms. 10. For the aforesaid submissions and in view of the compromise between the parties, the appeals are liable to be dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the joint memo filed by both parties, however, with a rider that the parties shall be bound by the terms of the joint memo, as confirmed across the Bar by both the learned counsel and agreed by both parties. The joint memo and the terms shall be placed on record and a copy shall be enclosed to this common judgment. 11. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, subject to terms of comprise mentioned in the joint memo enclosed to this judgment. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 12. As a sequel, all miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the appeals shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:29.09.2026 Knr 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT Nos.578 and 667 OF 2015 29.09.2026 Knr 9