Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11758 (ALL)

ARPIT KUMAR KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/22999/2026 · 2026-09-29

Padam Narain Mishra, Salil Kumar Rai

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22999 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. No notice is issued to respondent No.4 in view of the order proposed to be passed. 3. The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 23.07.2026 registered as Case Crime No.318 of 2026, under Sections 210, 211, 318 of the B.N.S. and Section 15(2) and 15(3) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Police Station Aurai, District Bhadohi. 4. We have perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses commission of offence and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned FIR, are punishable with a term up to seven years, therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned FIR, it is directed that the respondents/authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 41(1)(b) and Section 41-A of Cr.P.C./Section 35(3) to 35(7) of Bhartiya Nagrika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheeraj Kumar Yadav, Hind Pratap Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arpit Kumar Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in judgement and order dated 28.01.2021 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) reported in 2021 (2) ACR 1147, be strictly complied with. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 Rakesh CRLP No. 22999 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad