Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11756 (KAR)

SMT. SHRUTHI M v. SRI. MANOJ KUMAR

CP/19/2026 · 2026-02-25

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11868 CP No. 19 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 19 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHRUTHI M D/O N.MANJUNATHA W/O MANOJ KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT, NO.61, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWAR NAGARA BENGALURU-560 079. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SANDESH T.B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MANOJ KUMAR S/O SRI. SANJEEVA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT, ASHRAYA APARTMENT NO.004, MATADABEETU CROSS ROAD VTC: UDUPI, POST: KUNJIBETTU UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 101. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT-SERVED) THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 24 OF CPC PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE M.C. NO. 261/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, UDUPI, TO THE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU. Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11868 CP No. 19 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Petitioner's Counsel present. 2. Respondent's Counsel did not turn up, even after service of notice. 3. Heard the argument of petitioner's Counsel. 4. This petition is filed by wife for transfer of M.C.No.261/2025 filed by husband on 01.12.2025 before Family Court, Udupi. 5. It is stated that petitioner/wife is residing in Bengaluru in a rented house from April, 2024 and the marriage was performed in the year 2013 and they are blessed with a baby boy and now he is aged 4 years. The distance between Udupi and Bangalore is 410 kms. It seems that both of them went to USA. The petitioner returned along with the child and mother in July 2023. Respondent returned to India in July, 2024 after renewal of the H-1B visa. Petitioner stated that - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11868 CP No. 19 of 2026 respondent neglected her and not paid any maintenance. As such, she secured another employment and relocated to Bangalore and residing in a rented house. She expressed that she made her best efforts for reunion. Even husband also filed restitution of conjugal rights for reunion. However, as the petitioner is working in Bangalore and the distance between Bangalore and Udupi is 410 kms, it is inconvenient for her to travel with the child or by leaving her with the parents. This Court finds it reasonable to transfer MC No.261/2025 from Family Court, Udupi to Family Court Bangalore. However, as both parties are interested for reunion, the trial Court is directed to make efforts before the mediation center. Accordingly, civil petition is allowed. In view of disposal of petition, pending IAs stand disposed of. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PKN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42