Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11752 (GAU)

Smti Moman Tayeng v. The State of AP and 5 Ors

WP(C)/56/2026 · 2026-08-13

Budi Habung

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/ GAHC040002052026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/56/2026 Smti Moman Tayeng Wife of Shri Osik Borang, resident of Agam Colony, PO and SP Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, State of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Secretary Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Office of the Deputy Commissioner Est Siang District PO Pasihgat Arunachal Pradesh 791102 5:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Page No.# 2/ PO Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 791102 6:The Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 79110 Advocate for the Petitioner : Niranjan Sarma, Abanso Gamre Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 14.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. Gamre, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. Mr. Gamre, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the notification issued by the Government in connection with the claim of the petitioner, he has been instructed not to pressed with the matter any further and, accordingly, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the same, to which Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate, has raised no objection. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE Sabnam Mepo (SPA)