KARBHARI NARAYAN SONAWANE, L.RS. SANJAY AND OTHERS v. NAMDEO VITTHAL WAGHMARE AND OTHERS
WP/10291/2014 · 2026-09-23
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11752 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11752 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
48 WP No.10291.2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2014 KARBHARI NARAYAN SONAWANE, L.RS. SANJAY AND OTHERS VERSUS NAMDEO VITTHAL WAGHMARE AND OTHERS *** Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Vishal S. Badakh AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. P. P. Dawalkar Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Sachin V. Karad h/f Mr. H. D. Deshmukh *** WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10960 OF 2014 KARBHARI NARAYAN SONAWANE, L.RS. SANJAY AND OTHERS VERSUS BABAN MURLIDHAR WAGHMARE AND OTHERS *** Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Vishal S. Badakh AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. P. P. Dawalkar Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Sachin V. Karad h/f Mr. H. D. Deshmukh *** CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 23rd September, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. While raising the issue of maintainability, the learned AGP has placed on record a copy of the judgment and order dated 14.07.2025 rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 3293 of 2024. 2026:BHC-AUG:43385
48 WP No.10291.2014 -2-
2. When confronted with the same, the learned counsel for the petitioners concedes to the legal position and confirms the same.
3. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate alternative authority.
4. The concerned authority may take into account the time spent in prosecuting the present petition while considering application for condonation of delay.
5. Needless to state, all contentions of the litigating parties are kept open.
6. With the aforesaid liberty and directions, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) Omkar Joshi