SHEELA YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A227/12845/2026 · 2026-09-29
Vikram D Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11752 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11752 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12845 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned AGA for the State.
2. The petition is filed with the following prayer:
"I. Issue an appropriate, suitable order or direction directing the trial court/ Principle Judge, Family Court to decide the Criminal Misc. Case No. 104 of 2026 (Sheela Yadav and others vs Ram Suresh) filed under Section 144 B.N.S.S., within a stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble court. II. Issue an appropriate, suitable order or direction directing the trial court/ Principle Judge, Family Court to decide the interim maintenance application pending in Criminal Misc. Case No 104 of 2026 (Sheela Yadav and others vs Ram Suresh) filed under Section 144 B.N.S.S, within a stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble court."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that petition under Section 144 BNSS is pending. As per petitioners, in February, 2026 petition has been filed.
4. The order sheet of the trial court has not been annexed along with the petition.
5. Be that as it may, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prefer expedite application before the trial court. September 30, 2026 D. Tamang
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, Stuti Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Sheela Yadav And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad