Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11748 (AP)

Yenni Jayalakhmi v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7565/2021 · 2026-09-29

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010514282021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7565/2021 Between: 1. YENNI JAYALAKHMI,, W/O. HARIKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. PEDDA PADMAPURAM VILLAGE, IN MELIAPUTTI, MANDEL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 2. YENNI HARIKRISHNA, S/O. GUNAKARARAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE ELECTRICIAN, AND CULTIVATION, PEDDA PADMAPURAM VILLAGE, IN MELIAPUTTI, MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto quash the proceedings in Crl R.P. No. 53 of 2018 dated 18-03-2020 on the file of VIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sompeta confirming the order passed in M.C. No. 15 of 2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Tekkali dt. 20-07-2018 and grant maintenance as prayed for and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 5,000/- per month to the petitioner pending disposal of the main Crl. Petition, and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. Dr.SATTARU RAJANI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7565 OF 2021 ORDER: Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On the last adjournment i.e. on 07.09.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. In the result, this Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J Dt:30.09.2026 Scs 4 31 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7565 OF 2021 Dated: 30.09.2026 SCS