Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11743 (AP)

K.PADMA v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/630/2019 · 2026-09-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010171422019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 630/2019 Between: 1. K.PADMA, PROP. MAHESH RICE AND DAIL INDUSTRIES. RIO KODADA VILLAGE, NALGONDA DISTRICT. TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATI. 2. NARRAVULAVENKATESWARLU, R/O GANUGAPENTA VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL. SRI S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present. Smt. Sudha Rani, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kavali, in C.C.No.99 of 2012, dated 05.05.2016, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.137 of 2016, dated 10.05.2019, by the learned III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nellore, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 23.09.2026 VTS