Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11739 (AP)

Kakani Venkata Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/7791/2026 · 2026-09-24

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010466122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7791/2026 Between: 1. KAKANI VENKATA RAO, S/O KAKANI SANKARA RAO,AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O BLOCK NO.A-11, RAMALAKSHMI ENCLAVE,CHENCHUPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522202. 2. KADIYAM ANNAPURNA ALIAS ANNAPURNAMMA, W/O HARI BABU,AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 1-37, VALIVERU, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522211. 3. KADIYAM RAGHUDEEP, S/O HARI BABU,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 1-37, VALIVERU, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522211. 4. KADIYAM SANDEEP NAIDU, S/O HARI BABU,AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 1-37, VALIVERU, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522211. 5. KADIYAM NAGAMALLESWARI, W/O KADIYAM RAGHUDEEP,AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,R/O 1-37, VALIVERU, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522211 6. KADIYAM GEETHA NAVYA SRI ALIAS CHEBROLU GEETHA NAVYA SRI, W/O KADIYAM SANDEEP NAIDU,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 1-37, VALIVERU, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522211. 7. KAKANI RAGHU, S/O KAKANI SANKARA RAO,AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 10-21-7, BLOCK NO.A-11, RAMALAKSHMI ENCLAVE,CHENCHUPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522202. 8. KAKANI ANUSHA, W/O KAKANI RAGHU,AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O 10-21-7, BLOCK NO.A-11,RAMALAKSHMI ENCLAVE, CHENCHUPET, TENALI,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 2 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.7791 of 2026 Dated 25.09.2026 522202. 9. CHEBROLU RAGHAVA RAO, S/O VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 11-66/2, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522034. 10. CHEBROLU SARITHA, W/O CHEBROLU RAGHAVA RAO,AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O 11-66/2, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522034. 11. CHEBROLU BAVIN SAITEJA, S/O CHEBORLU RAGHAVA RAO,AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O 11-66/2, GORANTIA,GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522034. 12. SHAIK RIYAZ ALIAS RIAZUL HAQ SHAIK, S/O KHAZA RAHMTULLA SHAIK,AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O 24-8-33/A, BOSE NAGAR,CHINARAVURU THOTA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER,TENALI II TOWN P.S, GUNTUR DISTRICT,REP. THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHHIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. ANNAVARAPAU MALLIKA KUSUMA KUMARI, W/O. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGE. 75 YEARS, R/O. NANDULAPET, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 11.09.2026 IN CRL.P.NO.7791 OF 2026. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): AJAY KUMAR KANAPARTHI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. KOPPULA SARITA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.7791 of 2026 Dated 25.09.2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’) by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 8 and 10 to 13, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.130 of 2026 of Tenali II Town Police Station, Guntur District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 351(2), 61(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNS’). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the alleged offences levelled against the petitioners/accused are punishable with imprisonment for a term of less than seven (07) years. 4. This Court, vide order dated 11.09.2026, directed the Investigating Officer to comply with the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation1 , Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar2 and Md.Asfak Alam v. the State of Jharkhand3., and also with the provisions of Section 35(3) of the ‘the BNSS’. The petitioners were 1 Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021, dated 15.01.2026 2(2014) 8 SCC 273 3(2023) 8 SCC 632 4 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.7791 of 2026 Dated 25.09.2026 also directed to cooperate with the Investigating Officer, who was permitted to proceed with the further investigation. 5. In view of the aforesaid order, no further order is required for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, as there is no apprehension of their arrest. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 25.09.2026 RSI 5 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.7791 of 2026 Dated 25.09.2026 77 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7791 of 2026 Date: 25.09.2026 RSI