Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000862026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/17/2026 Gobom Tayeng Son of Late Kako Tayeng, permanent resident of Kiyit Village, PO and PS Mebo, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Aruanachal Pradesh, Itanagar.2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Additional Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Mebo Circle East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Circle Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Mebo Circle East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Atik @ Otik Saring Age: 65 Occupation : Son of Late Yame Saring Page No.# 2/3 resident of Kiyit Village PO and PS Mebo East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, E S NIDO MARI,Biri Esther,Wanglat Khomrang,Tadar Bai,Tame Rimi,Nannu Yubi,Maklek Lego,Bomyom Ori,K Gara,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Dicky Panging, Sr. Adv,Tenzin Tsowang,Omor Panggam,Marge Doji,Daina Tamuk,Mitin Boko,Chatung Tajo,Tokge Darin,Doge Lona BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 06-08-2026 Mr. I. Bam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the recommendation made for appointment of the respondent No. 5, as Gaon Burah of Kiyit village, which is under challenge in the present writ petition, the competent authority has acted, thereon, and has appointed the said respondent No. 4 as Gaon Burah of the said village. He submits that the appointment order would now also required to be assailed. The learned counsel for the petitioner, accordingly, submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same by also assailing the appointment of the respondent No. 5, herein, as the Gaon Burah of the said village. The prayer is not objected to by Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh, appearing for the State respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant