KARAN LUTHRA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR SMT. NEENA LUTHRA v. ANIRUDRA TANWAR & ORS. & ORS.
FAO/194/2026 · 2026-07-10
Manoj Kumar Ohri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11737 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11737 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 194/2026 KARAN LUTHRA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR SMT.
NEENA LUTHRA
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Senior Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Dewan, Mr. Raunak Gupta and Mr. Manoj Kumar
versus
ANIRUDRA TANWAR & ORS. & ORS.
.....Respondent
Through: Mohd. Shahnawaz, Advocate 49 + FAO 195/2026&CM APPL. 42875/2026
KARAN LUTHRA NOW DECEASED
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Senior Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Dewan, Mr. Raunak Gupta and Mr. Manoj Kumar
versus
HARICHARAN CHAUDHARY & ORS.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Azhar Ayaz, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R %
10.07.2026 CAV 304/2026 Considering that the respondents are represented through their counsels, the caveat stands discharged.
CM APPL. 42860/2026 & CM APPL. 42861/2026 in FAO 194/2026 and CM APPL. 42873/2026& CM APPL. 42874/2026 in FAO 195/2026 (exemptions)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The present applications are disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:28:04
FAO 194/2026, CM APPL. 42859/2026 & FAO 195/2026, CM APPL. 42872/2026
1. By way of the present appeals, the appellant seeks to assail the impugned
order dated 30.05.2026,passed by the learned District Judge-06 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit bearing No. CS DJ No. 150/2026 titled as
“Anirudra Tanwar vs. Karan Luthra (Now Deceased) & Others” in respect of the suit property situated in Village Dera Mandi, Tehsil Hauz Khas (Now Mehrauli), New Delhi.
2. Mr. Yadav, learned Senior counsel, submits that in a similar suit filed by another party, i.e., M/s Krishna Estates, this Court had set aside a similar order vide judgment dated 29.05.2026, passed in FAO 79/2026. He submits that despite a copy of the said judgment being placed on record, the Trial Court ignored the same and passed the impugned order on the following day, i.e., 30th May 2026, at 4:30 pm. Learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, further submits that no relief is claimed against respondent nos. 4 and 5 at this stage.
3. Issue Notice.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents accepts Notice.
5. Till the next date of hearing, the operation of the impugned order dated 30.05.2026 shall remain stayed.
6. Renotify on 28.09.2026.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 10, 2026/sn This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:28:04