Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11731 (DEL)

PARVEEN DALAL v. DCB BANK LTD AND ORS.

W.P.(C)/9042/2026 · 2026-07-09

Renu Bhatnagar, Vivek Chaudhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9042/2026, CM APPL. 42361/2026 PARVEEN DALAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saket Singh, Advocate. versus DCB BANK LTD AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hashmat Nabi and Mr. Farah Naaz, Advs. for DCB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 09.07.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Order dated 21.04.2026 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, „DRAT‟) with the following prayers: “a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus/Certiorari Setting Aside the Vide Order dated 21.04.2026 passed by the Hon‟ble DRAT, Delhi in Misc. Appeal No. 807/2026, to the extent of granting the Petitioner an extension of 60 days or such reasonable time as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to make the payment of the final balance settlement amount; b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No. 1 Bank, Respondent No. 2, and Respondent No. 3 not to take any coercive steps, including taking physical possession of the secured asset i.e., House No. 373, Sector- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:53:51 8, Faridabad, Haryana, during the extended period; c) Stay the operation of the Order dated 13.02.2026 passed by Ld. DM, Faridabad and the Notice dated 08.04.2026 issued by the Naib Tehsildar, pending compliance of the settlement by the Petitioner; and d) Pass any other order(s) or direction(s) which this Hon‟ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, equity, and good conscience.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the learned DRAT concerned seeking extension of time or for any other appropriate remedy. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JULY 9, 2026 p/sm This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:53:51