Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1173 (KAR)

SRI N S NARASEGOWDA v. BANGALORE, BANGALORE RURAL AND

WP/25323/2022 · 2026-04-02

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18136 WP No.25323 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25323 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N.S. NARASEGOWDA S/O SRI. SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.692, 'A' 8TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, BASAVESHWARNAGAR BENGALURU - 560079. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAI PRAKASH REDDY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE, BANGALORE RURAL AND RAMANAGARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.6, 5TH MAIN CHAMARAJPETE BENGALURU - 560018 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. KONARK CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.56, SUBBARAMACHETTY ROAD NATKALAPPA CIRCLE, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560 004 BY ITS SECRETARY. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18136 WP No.25323 of 2022 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BENGALURU REGION GMC BANKING BUILDING ANNEXE PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMARAJPETE BENGALURU PRESENTLY AT SAHAKARA SOUDHA MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU - 560003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SATHVIK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S. SARAVANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R3; V/O DATED 16.12.2022 NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.03.2014 IN DISPUTE NO.JRB/DIS/167/1996-97 VIDE ANNEXURE-G PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 AND ORDER DATED 04.01.2019 IN APPEAL NO.153/2014 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18136 WP No.25323 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the competent authority - Tribunal. The submission is accepted. Reserving liberty as prayed for, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. I.A.1/2023 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0