Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11727 (KAR)

SRI. JAVEED PASHA v. TAHSILDHAR

WP/5187/2026 · 2026-02-19

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10361 WP No. 5187 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5187 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAVEED PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL GAFFUR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.58, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. KHALID PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL GAFFUR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.58, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. NAVEED PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL GAFFUR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.58, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10361 WP No. 5187 of 2026 4. WAJEED PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL GAFFUR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.58, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.D. RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: TAHSILDHAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 049. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.09.2025 AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10361 WP No. 5187 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent-Tahsildar. 2. Learned AGA raises a primary objection that the petitioners are seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Tahsildar to consider the representations given by the petitioners to remove the names of certain persons found in the RTC and show the name of the petitioners in their place. Learned AGA submits that such direction cannot be given by this Court. It is for the petitioners to file an appeal before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 questioning the mutation orders. Upholding the submissions of the learned AGA the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Assistant Commissioner for redressal of their grievance. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10361 WP No. 5187 of 2026 Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39