- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14581 WP No. 6086 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.6086 OF 2024 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: 1. SMT VENKATAMMA W/O LATE GUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/A GUDEMARANAHALLI SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 127. 2. SMT ALEMELAMMA W/O SRI NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/A GUDEMARANAHALLI SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562 127. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUDHA M.G., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, KAPDANA – BEERASANDRA, BANGALORE-562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14581 WP No. 6086 of 2024 DODDABALLAPURA- SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. 5. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED LANDS NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.SESHU, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE GRANT RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.18 OF GUDEMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMNAGAR DISTRICT IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 04.03.2026, the following order was passed; “On the previous occasion, this Court has looked into the original records submitted by the learned HCGP and this Court has recorded what it found from the original records. There was no representation for the petitioners on the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14581 WP No. 6086 of 2024 previous date of hearing. Today too, there is no representation. Re-list this matter on 11.03.2026. If there is no representation for the petitioners on the next date of hearing, the writ petition will be dismissed for non- prosecution.” 2. The matter was called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY