Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11720 (BOM)

AKSHAY GAJANAN AMARAVATKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS CITY WASHIM, TQ. AND DIST. WASHIM

ABA/845/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Order 280926aba845.26 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [ABA] NO. 845/2026. Akshay Gajanan Amaravatkar -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Shri V.J. Gawali, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri H.D. Marathe, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR , J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026. Heard. 2. Perusal of record shows that earlier application i.e. Criminal Application (ABA) No.332/2026 filed by the applicant was permitted to be withdrawn on instructions vide order dated 04.05.2026. It also reveals that this Court has granted bail to one of the accused Subham Rajguru vide order dated 18.08.2026 in Criminal Application (ABA) No.715/2026. The submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant is that, on that basis the applicant is approaching this Court. 2026:BHC-NAG:12753 Order 280926aba845.26 2 3. It appears that the applicant has not approached the Sessions Court either after withdrawal of his earlier application or after the order granting bail to the co-accused Shubham. In such circumstances, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. 4. Permission granted. Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for. JUDGE Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 28/09/2026 15:51:06